PE · VC · Corp Dev · IPO

M&A Lawyers in Switzerland

Deal structuring, DDs, high-stakes negotiations, closing. Close better deals faster.

Switzerland's largest law firm focused on tech companies
30+ legal experts — strategic advisory, seamless execution
Buy-side and sell-side, across CH, DE, the EU & the US
$100M+ in active escrow mandates
Transparent pricing & flat fees
Trusted by 1'500+ clients
Marc Maurer
“LEXR supported us with great efficiency and pragmatism during the acquisition of a complex software company. I can highly recommend them for buy-side tech M&A.”

Marc Maurer · COO VMS, Chapters Group

Trusted by 1'500+ tech companies & investors

Why LEXR for deals

01

Legal due diligence

Are you looking to buy a company? Our tech law experts possess the legal, technical, and sector expertise to identify real problems quickly. They can assist you with short red-flag reviews or comprehensive legal due diligence for tech companies — whether it involves due diligence on software, FinTech, DeepTech, Web3, or other tech sectors.

02

Legal due diligence readiness

Are you looking to sell a company? Let our legal experts get your house in order and prepare your data room to avoid surprises when the prospective buyers review your files.

03

M&A in tech always has an international angle

With our in-house experts covering Switzerland, Germany, the EU, and the US, and our network of tech-savvy lawyers worldwide, we can execute your global tech due diligence and transactions.

04

Transparent pricing & flat fees

Share purchase agreement review: flat-fee CHF 2'500, price fixed before we start, report delivered within 4 business days. Convertible loan agreement: delivered in 48 hours, flat fee CHF 2'000. Escrow: transparent pricing from CHF 10'000.

How a deal runs

Term sheet to closing

The stages of a Swiss tech transaction, and who does what at each of them.

Global reach. Local roots. One team

LEXR offices

  • Zürich
  • Lausanne
  • St. Gallen
  • Davos
  • Brooklyn
  • Berlin
  • Munich
  • News LEXR writes the licensing guidelines for the EU's official Chips Design Platform EuroCDP
  • Deal LEXR represents a Swiss institution in a $100m+ acquisition of a Swiss FinTech
  • Deal LEXR structures a tokenized tracker certificate and drafts EU prospectus for retail distribution
  • Deal LEXR advises a FinTech scale-up on their Delaware flip to expand to the US market

M&A and VC FAQ

What founders, CFOs and investors ask us before a deal.

Most Swiss tech sales are share deals: the buyer takes the company with its contracts, licences and employees, so nothing needs re-signing. An asset deal is the choice when the buyer wants one product line, or wants to leave a known liability behind — but every material contract then needs a change-of-control consent, and staff transfer under Art. 333 CO.

Three to six months, term sheet to closing, is normal for a tech company with clean documentation. Due diligence is four to eight weeks of it. The two things that add months are a cap table that needs repairing first and an IP chain that was never assigned from founders or contractors.

Cap table and share history, IP ownership and licences-in, key customer and supplier contracts, employment and ESOP, data protection, and any regulatory licence the business runs on. Findings land as a report ranked by price impact, with the remediation named.

Swiss merger control bites at defined turnover thresholds, and a deal can also be notifiable in the EU or Germany on the parties' figures alone, so the test is per transaction rather than per company size. A regulated target — a FinTech, a payment or a crypto business — needs the change of qualified participation cleared by FINMA before closing. Both are gating items: they set the closing date, so they get checked at term-sheet stage.

Warranties are statements about the company that the buyer can claim against; the negotiation is over their scope, the liability cap and how long they survive. An earn-out ties part of the price to post-closing performance, which means the metric, who controls it and how it is audited belong in the SPA — an earn-out defined loosely is the most common source of post-closing dispute.

A 1x non-participating preference pays the investor their money back before the common shares get anything, and nothing more. Participating, or a multiple above 1x, pays them back and then again alongside the founders — which changes founder proceeds most in a mid-range exit, not a large one. It is a term-sheet decision, not a closing detail.

Rounds and transaction documents carry a fixed fee, quoted once the scope and the deal size are known. Some are published: a share purchase agreement review is a flat fee of CHF 2'500 with the report delivered within 4 business days, a convertible loan agreement is CHF 2'000 and delivered in 48 hours, and escrow starts from CHF 10'000. Diligence is scoped from the target's size. What genuinely cannot be fixed — a live negotiation, a hostile timetable — is billed against a pre-paid block, drawn down as used. No hourly targets.

Planning a round or an exit? Let's scope it

Thirty minutes with the deal team. Bring the term sheet if you have one, the cap table if you do not.